Asset Based Lending: the Charging Bull in the Distressed Debt Market
February 26, 2010scfm 9 Comments »Distressed Debt is starting to make a lot of noise in the alternative investment arena, and with everyone jumping on the boat it might be ready to tip. I have seen numerous announcements of new distressed debt funds and I think we will keep seeing more down the line. Here are questions you should be asking: who are going to be the winners and losers, and does anyone really know how distressed the debt really is?
The buzz in the investment air went from buying real estate to buying distressed debt. What I would like to concentrate on here is distressed debt in the form of real estate mortgages. Being a fund manager of a specialized fund that operates as an asset based lender in the business of alternative financing, we are getting hit almost daily with people looking for money for foreclosure acquisitions. Everyone is talking about buying foreclosures, and the media is again helping to purport the good news/bad news story by publishing articles about investors making big money through foreclosures. The most favored structure for investors is to negotiate short sales with banks before the foreclosure, and lately it seems the banks are more open to this option than before.
A short sale, for those of you not familiar with the term, is a sale of a mortgage note for less than its face value. Banks do this because they want to get the bad debt off of their books. This works well in a good market because it gives the new note holder instant equity in an appreciating asset with the hope of a large gain on the eventual sale after an eventual foreclosure. Granted, in this current market, short sale pricing is a little more discounted than usual, but for good reason since the housing market is a bit in shambles. Once an investor actually does negotiate a short sale and take possession of the note, the long foreclosure process begins.
First off, real estate is not a liquid asset and the foreclosure process makes it even more illiquid. If you are looking for a quick turnaround, look somewhere else. The foreclosure process is not only long and tedious, but if you are unfortunate enough to buy a note for a residential property that is owner occupied, the law is not on your side. As a rule, commercial property is a less regulated structure that is more of a business agreement than the regulated monster that is residential lending. In residential lending, the law gives the borrower every possible leniency and time is on their side. A residential owner can stretch out a foreclosure for anywhere between 6 to 18 months, and depending on the state and how much they fight it, it could go even longer than that. Imagine having to service the debt that was used to buy the foreclosure during this long unpredictable wait; every month the payment to carry that debt eats into the profit. However, that is only the start of the pain because you also need to add up all the costs like legal, insurance, maintenance, and the potential damage that will have to be repaired when the borrower leaves (needless to say, evicting someone from their own house brings out the worst in people). Wrap it all up and distressed debt starts looking less like a slam dunk and more like a dunking tank.
The big question is how certain are the funds betting on this strategy. Furthermore, I am curious about whether or not there is a long term strategy for these funds? If there is a long term strategy, what is it? Because the amount of new loans being made is decreasing, and once we start churning through all of the bad debt and foreclosures, how much business will there be to support a multi-billion dollar fund?
This is not to say that there aren’t a lot of very skilled fund managers out there with the experience and know-how to make this kind of strategy pay off, but if I had to take a guess, I would say that the Asset Based Lenders (ABL) are going to be the big winners here.
Now I am possibly biased. In full disclosure, the fund I co-manage is an asset based lender collateralizing on commercial real estate, but here are the facts to back up why the ABL’s are the play here. It takes cash to negotiate a short sale, and it is next to impossible to get a bank to give you an unsecured line to go out and buy short sales. Even trying to get a loan on a commercial property that you already own is becoming a magic trick, so these buyers only have one choice and that is alternative financing. These alternative financing sources can charge what they want for the simple reason of supply and demand. When I say they can charge what they want, I am talking about rates in the neighborhood of 11%-20% on average, and those are good returns in any market. Not only can they charge what they want, but they can also afford to be cautious. Most alternative financing sources (many being ABL funds) only lend on commercial real estate, and during the heyday, banks were lending somewhere between 75% to 100% loan-to-value(LTV) while ABL’s were generally lending around 65% (LTV). On average that is 15%-20% more collateral in a deal, and collateral translates into security. In addition, most good ABL’s are originating and underwriting their own loans which helps keep these valuations accurate. An experienced ABL should know how to sift through the numbers and nuances of a deal to understand what the end looks like before the start.
ABL’s are currently doing very well and the significant returns are still ahead of them. One must consider that ABL’s are probably going to lend around 65% LTV on a note that has already been negotiated down between 25%-30%. In fact, the new norm for ABL’s seems to be below a 60% LTV. That means that a note that was discounted 30% is then discounted by the ABL’s another 40%, and clearly the security starts looking more secure. If the borrower defaults and the ABL forecloses on the property, there is an awful lot of equity remaining to provide a potential gain in the end. It’s easy to see in the short-term that ABL’s are generating great returns through high interest, and in the long-term they have the potential to secure healthy gains through possible foreclosure on their own deals.
Let’s be clear, there is a vast amount of opportunity in distressed debt. However, the most lasting and secure opportunity is in the hands of whoever is at the end of the end game, and that long end game player is the Asset Based Lender.
Copyright: Dominic Mazzone, Regent Global Funds 2008
This article was written by Dominic Mazzone, Managing Partner and Fund Manager of Regent Global Funds.
This article and other like it can be viewed at http://www.investingsymposium.com which is part of the Regent Global Funds Network.
Regent Global Funds is a alternative investment fund that offers its participating investors and asset backed investment through asset based lending and can be found at www.rgfunds.com
The Fund Managers of Regent Global Funds have an expertise in commercial real estate lending and have created a successful alternative investment vehicle that is diversified through this structure.
They separate themselves from other fund mangers by personally investing their own money side-by-side with their investors in the fund, creating an absolute structure of accountability. Dominic Mazzone has written about the need for this type of accountability in an article titled Fund Managers Need to be Accessible and Personally Invested.
Question about debt funding
What is the difference between Corporate Bonds and Corporate Debt Funds?For example I can buy shares of the exchange traded fund: IShares S&P US Preferrd Stock Index Fund (PFF), which is classified as a Corporate Debt Funds BBB-Rated.
Is a corporate debt fund like PFF a collection of corporate bonds?
Thanks !
Related posts:
- Subprime Mortgage Lending – What are Its Effects? ubprime lending is really nothing new. It was originally...
- Real Estate Investors: What is Private Lending? Private lending, as I teach it and as I...
- Liquid Fund v/s Short Term Fixed Deposits These are two instruments which are used to earn...
- How Do Mutual Funds Work How Funds are sold Mutual Funds primarily depend...
- Personal Finance and Money Management 19 – Investment Return and Inflation Rate, Interest Rate, Market and Business Risk As we mentioned in previous articles we know that...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Tags: Alternative Investment, asset based lending, Fixed Income, Fund of Fund, Hard Money

Posted on February 26th, 2010 at 6:15 am
the Dems are trying to back the Republicans into a corner- if the Republicans oppose the new debt ceiling and vote against the bill, the Dems can claim that the Repubs don't support the troops
Posted on February 26th, 2010 at 6:49 am
Hamilton's idea was for rich people to loan the government money through bonds. In order for those bonds to retain any value (and the people holding them to be able to cash them in later), the government would have to survive. Therefore, those rich people would use their influence to make sure the government succeeded. Common people living hand-to-mouth didn't have extra money to loan out, or influence that would affect the fate of the new government, so they were pretty much left out of this process.
Posted on February 26th, 2010 at 7:46 pm
If I got all of the information correct, it looks like they will be issuing $300 million in debt.
500 million shares x$3/shr = 1.5 Billion
500 million shares x $2/shr = $1 Billion
leaving $500 million for the capital budget.
Of course, this is overly simplfied, because there would be taxes already taken out of the dividend payment.
Posted on February 27th, 2010 at 6:42 am
Send the collection agency a certified, return receipt letter requesting validation of the debt to include copies of contracts and other documentation that proves the debt is yours. Give them 30 days.
Posted on February 27th, 2010 at 8:43 am
Your question is unclear. Click on "Additional details" on the top right of ur screen and make the question clear and then i might be able to answer it
Posted on February 28th, 2010 at 4:05 pm
Sort of but not exactly. It is a collection of preferred stock, which are sort of a debt and in fact many times classified as debt but are further down on the food chain when it comes to bankruptcy proceedings than corporate bonds. Generally, preferred stock holder get nothing whereas corporate bond holders might bet a pertinence. Another difference is the tax consequences. A portion of the income from this fund will be taxed at the current preferred rate whereas bond interest is not.
Posted on March 1st, 2010 at 3:15 pm
My suggestion is trying to obsord as much information as you can before making up your mind,here http://www.DebtFreetips.info/debt-free.htm is a good one.
Posted on March 1st, 2010 at 3:32 pm
am not sure in India, but in majority of the market there are mutual funds that invested in bond. the fund managers will switch from one bond to another for the most profitable return.
Posted on March 1st, 2010 at 4:15 pm
I'll assume you're talking about a small closely held corporation. If possible, keep the amount of debt less than twice the amount of equity (i.e a 2 to 1 leverage ratio). If it gets much higher than than, the owners may end up with some very high rates of return when the company is profitable due to the leveraging. But the leverage ratio is an indicator of a company's ability to withstand adversity. So if you're highly leveraged and the economy goes into recession, you won't be able to ride it out for very long.
If you're raising additional equity from the current group of owners, that's fine. If you're bringing in new additional owners as a source of equity, then you have to be concerned with how they will interact with the present owners. Also, the original owners' ownership percentates will be diminished with possible loss of control and/or board of directors seats.